SUMMARY OF FACTS REGARDING THE 2024 ELECTION –

• On Dec 5, 2023, an AP article reported nearly two dozen computer scientists voiced concerns about a multi-state effort to unlawfully obtain copies of voting system software and provide it to allies of former President Trump, posing “serious threats” ahead of the 2024 election.

• Trump operatives obtained copies of voting software 3 years prior to the 2024 election.

• NBC News compiled a list of 67 locations in 19 counties which received bomb threats in high-population Democratic counties.

• After the election was called for Trump, Cyber Security Experts sent letters to Kamala Harris on 11-13-24 & 11-15-24 in which they claimed the 2024 election may have been hacked & urged her to demand Recounts in Swing States, stating; “You should reverse your concession, call for both a full investigation of criminal activity and demand hand recounts in all seven swing states”.

• To the detriment of our country, Harris chose to ignore Cyber Security Experts advice and instead retreated to a 7 million dollar estate in Hawaii @ $1,300 per night. By failing to order recounts in Swing States, Harris played right into the hands of Trump & Republicans, guaranteeing Trump would be sworn in with no investigations.

• Trump admitted the 2024 election and future elections will be rigged when he said ““I don’t need any votes. We got all the votes we need. We got more votes than anybody’s ever had. “Get out and vote just this time…. you won’t have to do it anymore… we’ll have it fixed so good, in four years you don’t have to vote again”

• Trump thanked Elon Musk at a rally on 1-19-2025 for help with Vote Counting Machines.

• Musk stated how voting easy computers are to hack. During an October 2024 town hall in Pennsylvania, Elon Musk stated; “I’m a technologist. I know a lot about computers and I’m like the last thing I would do is trust a computer because it’s just too easy to hack…. just add one line“.

• When Tucker Carlson asked Musk’s 4 yr/old son if Trump was going to win, he said; “Yeah, they’ll never know”.

• Joe Rogan stated on his show that Elon Musk knew Trump ‘won’ 4 hours before the election count was over.  Rogan stated; “Apparently Elon created an app and he knew who won 4 hours before the results. Dana White told me, I’m leaving, it’s over, Donald Won”

• June 5, 2025 Musk posted on “X”; Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate” 

• Videos from ElectionTruthAlliance.org show anomalies in the 2024 Elections in Swing States including unusual Drop Off Votes and evidence of a ‘Russian Tail Hack’.

• Journalist / Investigator to the BBC & Rolling Stone, Greg Palast claims he found over 3.5 million voters were disenfranchised by illegal voter purges, challenges & suppression tactics.

• Dr Beth Clarkson, a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer with a PhD in Statistics, stated she found patterns indicative of manipulation in elections and voting machines; “not just an anomaly that occurred in one place, but a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the U.S.”

• Ex-RNC Spokesperson and Political Strategist Cheri Jacobus says “Trump is an illegitimate President” who never legitimately won a Presidential election (2016 & 2024)

• Former Judge Michael Luttig and Constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe stated that Donald Trump is ineligible to be President under the 14th Amendment for his role in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.

• Constitutional law expert John Bonifaz stated that Trump engaged in an insurrection and is barred from federal office by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Bonifaz stated that Trump has no legal authority and every action he takes could be challenged in court.

• Constitutional Law Professor Evan Bernick of Northern Illinois University urged Congressional Democrats to initiate an Amnesty Vote to remove Trump from office which they ignored

• Trump told outrageous lies to get elected such as “I know nothing about Project 2025”. He therefore engaged in fraud and deception to get elected

 

Pre-Electronic Voting records from 1984 Shows Evidence of Manipulation Favoring Republicans Since 2016 in Electronic Vote Counting Computers

 

Dr Beth Clarkson, a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer with a PhD in Statistics, stated she found patterns indicative of manipulation in elections and voting machines; “not just an anomaly that occurred in one place, but a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the U.S.”

 

NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections

A retired NSA analyst has applied a simple formula to election results in Arizona, and found evidence of systemic and coordinated election fraud on a large scale. However, this appears to be limited to larger precincts, as anomalies in smaller precincts are more easily detected.

Analysis of recent election data has revealed a worrying pattern of potential fraud. In states where the margin of victory is less than 10%, the same mathematical formula has been found to consistently result in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican. The five major voting machine companies have all been found to have close financial ties to the GOP, raising questions of conflict of interest. Tagg Romney, son of the former presidential candidate, has denied any such conflict, despite his investment in Hart Intercivic and Diebold.

“Easy to Cheat”

Michael Duniho, a retired NSA analyst, has spent the past seven years investigating voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. His research has focused on a 2006 RTA Bond issue election, which has been subject to much discussion in the media. According to Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, since you can’t see what is going on in the machine.”

Duniho applied a mathematical model to the voting results from the largest precincts in Arizona and found that the Republican candidate in every election since 2008 had gained 8-10% in the polls, while the Democratic candidate had lost 8-10%. This swing of up to 20 points could be enough to swing an election, unless the candidate was already losing badly.

Duniho, with decades of experience in deciphering large amounts of data for the NSA, was determined to understand why this pattern was only occurring in the largest precincts.

Nose Counting

Francois Choquette and James Johnson have uncovered an intriguing phenomenon in the February Republican primary contest in South Carolina. An unusually large number of votes were cast for Mitt Romney in larger precincts, while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward. This prompted Choquette to examine the results in all 50 states, where he found a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP in all states except Utah. Further investigation revealed that Romney had used the same technique against John McCain in Maricopa County in 2008, although McCain’s lead was too large to be affected.

Given the sheer scale of the task, Choquette has provided a set of instructions to enable others to replicate the analysis in their own county or state. The implications of this research could be far-reaching and Choquette’s work is certainly worthy of further examination.

Stealing Votes

Analysis of voting patterns in Arizona has revealed a significant discrepancy between the size of precincts and the results of the election. According to Professor Duniho, if the percentages of votes remained consistent between precincts, the trend line would be flat. However, the reality is that the lines slope downwards for Democrats and upwards for Republicans. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the 2012 Presidential primary, where votes for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul were systematically bled off and credited to Mitt Romney. After Duniho’s spreadsheet was completed, the actual vote totals from other Arizona election contests were compared, further confirming the discrepancy.

Analysis of the 2010 elections in Arizona has revealed evidence of manipulation. From Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, the trends lines all indicated that a single individual had inserted a program into the system’s central computer, flipping votes. The results were astonishing: Governor Brewer had actually lost her election and Gabby Gifford’s slim victory over Tea Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was much greater than the reported 1%.

John Duniho, a political analyst, has called for strong hand count audits to confirm the integrity of the elections. This would involve comparing hand counts to the official reports. Such measures are essential to ensure the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Ohio Precedent

For years, Republicans have been accused of vote tampering in elections. In 2004, the presidential election in Ohio and Florida brought these allegations to the forefront. In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell was accused of creating a computer program with a trap door that shifted Democratic votes to the Republican Party. Connell was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Department of Justice to provide Connell with security due to two threats made against his life by people associated with Karl Rove. Tragically, Connell was killed in a plane crash before the trial began.

In Florida, the University of California at Berkeley’s Quantitative Methods Research Team conducted a study that found anomalies between Florida counties using touch-screen voting and those using other methods that could not be explained statistically. The study showed that counties using electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who conducted the study, said that the evidence was too strong to ignore, noting that the probability of such evidence occurring where the true difference is zero is less than once in a thousand chances.

Don’t Trust, Verify

The integrity of the upcoming US election is under scrutiny after an analysis by statistician Richard Duniho found evidence of vote-flipping. This could only be possible if computerized voting machines were programmed to steal votes. Calls to conduct hand counts of ballots by precinct to verify the results have been unsuccessful in Pima County, Arizona, where anomalies were first detected in 2006. With the election just 12 days away, it is unclear whether a judge will be willing to reverse past trends and permit access to ballots.

The implications of this are concerning. More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots, believing their vote will be fairly counted. If the analysis is correct, criminals could be stealing up to 10% of votes without consequence. This could have a significant impact on the outcome of the election, which is much closer than in 2008 when President Obama won by a large margin. It is essential that the American democratic system is not undermined by another election crisis, raising questions over the last three national Presidential election results.

Don’t Take Our Word

As the US election results continue to pour in, the need for accuracy and transparency has never been greater. In the UK, paper ballots are used and the final outcome can take up to three days to be finalized. This is because every ballot is transparently hand-counted, providing citizens with the assurance that their votes are counted accurately.

The Justice Department’s insistence that results must be reported by 11 pm for the television networks is not only misguided, but irresponsible. It is time for Americans to demand hand ballot counts, and to reject the notion of being victimized by vote fraud. The news that Serbia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are sending election monitors to watch the US election is a stark reminder of the need for accuracy and transparency in this process. It is time for Americans to take control of their own destiny and ensure that their votes are counted accurately.

 

Republicans Have a Friend in the Company That Counts Their Votes

Republicans have a friend in the company that counts their votes

Per the above article: After initially focusing on the surprisingly lopsided results of the senatorial election in Kentucky, DCReport broadened our scope to look at the electronic vote-counting software and electronic voting systems that we rely on to tally our votes. This prompted us to raise questions about Electronic Systems & Software (ES&S), America’s largest voting machine company. What we found was a revolving door between government officials and ES&S.

Voting results in three states that saw surprising majorities by vulnerable incumbent Republican senators—Maine, North Carolina and South Carolina—were almost all tabulated on ES&S machines.

Trump and his inept legal team barely have mentioned ES&S, focusing almost exclusively on Dominion Voting Systems. Team Trump has been so vigorous in going after Dominion that it prompted us to look into how ES&S operates. What we have found so far is far from comforting.

• Owned by a private equity firm, ES&S has been elusive about identifying the people in its ownership.
• A number of ES&S executives and lobbyists have ties to top GOP election officials and politicians.
• The ES&S executive in charge of the security previously worked in the Trump administration as a government executive at Health and Human Services before leaving under a cloud.
• Forty of the 50 states use ES&S to cast and count some of their votes.
• Of the 25 states Trump won, all but 3 either partially or fully relied on ES&S machines. The states where Trump won that didn’t use ES&S machines were Oklahoma, Louisiana and Alaska.

Concerns about the reliability of vote-counting software are not new, dating back to the 1980s. Having the ability to audit votes, and making sure ballots are counted properly, has long been a major concern of computer scientists, politicians and election officials.

In requesting details about the ownership of ES&S, the lawmakers specifically noted, “We are particularly concerned that secretive and ‘trouble-plagued companies,’ owned by private equity firms and responsible for manufacturing and maintaining voting machines and other election administration equipment, ‘have long skimped on security in favor of convenience,’ leaving voting systems across the country ‘prone to security problems’.”

Our democracy now relies on private companies, which build proprietary electronic systems, to reliably count our votes. It seems reasonable, if not crucial, to understand who is behind these companies as a standard to ensure election integrity. Without such knowledge we run the risk that zealots, investors with financial stakes in who wins elections or those susceptible to bribery have an incentive to use subtle software programming techniques to deliberately miscount votes to guarantee an outcome. In close elections, software code that invalidates or miscounts a mere sliver of ballots can change the outcome”.

 

https://www.techbuzz.ai/articles/gop-operative-buys-dominion-controls-27-states-voting-systems

Per the above article: “A former Republican operative just gained control of America’s second-largest voting machine company. Scott Leiendecker’s acquisition of Dominion Voting Systems – now rebranded as Liberty Vote – puts him in charge of election equipment used across 27 states, including all of Georgia. The deal has election experts worried about the concentration of voting infrastructure under partisan control, especially given the ongoing political battles over election integrity and Dominion’s history with conspiracy theories.

The voting machine industry just got a major shakeup that has election integrity advocates scratching their heads. Scott Leiendecker, a former GOP operative from Missouri, completed his acquisition of Dominion Voting Systems last week, immediately rebranding the controversial company as Liberty Vote in what he calls “a bold and historic move to transform and improve election integrity in America.”

The deal gives Leiendecker unprecedented control over American election infrastructure. His newly acquired company operates voting systems in 27 states, while his existing firm Knowink provides electronic poll books in 29 states. The overlap is staggering – 14 states covering 20 million registered voters use both systems, giving Leiendecker’s companies end-to-end control of the voting process from voter check-in to ballot tabulation. Georgia, a critical swing state, uses both systems statewide”.

 

Hacking Voting Machines is Easier Than You Think

Senate Election Security Briefing Clip 3 – Intro

 

Senate Election Security Briefing Clip 6

This video demonstrates how easily voting machines can be programmed to rig an election. Shelby County Election Commissioner Bennie Smith demonstrates how. Audience members choose who will win the election and the malware on the voting machine declares that candidate the winner.

 

DEFCON 2025 Voting Village show Jessica Denson just how easy it is to hack a voting machine widely used in the 2024 election. Also, FSFP Senior Election Security Advisor Susan Greenhalgh debuts their new review of the weakness of post-election audits in swing states, and Election Integrity Foundation Executive Director Catherine Terranova explains why acknowledging voting machine vulnerabilities is far from conspiracy.

 

Hacking Democracy

Mar 20, 2014 – This is the hack that proved America’s elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. The ‘Hursti Hack’ in this video is an excerpt from the feature length Emmy nominated documentary ‘Hacking Democracy’. The hack of the Diebold voting system in Leon County, Florida, is real. It was verified by computer scientists at UC Berkeley. To watch the full movie, visit http://www.hackingdemocracy.com

The disturbingly shocking HBO documentary HACKING DEMOCRACY bravely tangles with our nation’s ills at the heart of democracy. The film the Diebold corporation doesn’t want you to see, this revelatory journey follows tenacious Seattle grandmother Bev Harris and her band of extraordinary citizen-activists as they set out to ask one simple question: How does America count its votes? From Florida and California to Ohio and Washington State, filmmakers Simon Ardizzone, Russell Michaels and Robert Cohen starkly reveal a broken system riddled with secrecy, incompetent election officials, and electronic voting machines that can be programmed to steal elections. Equipped only with a powerful sense of righteous outrage, the activists take on voting machine industry, exposing alarming security holes in America’s trusted voting machines. They even go dumpster diving at a county election official’s office in Florida, uncovering incendiary evidence of miscounted votes. But proving our votes can be stolen without a trace culminates in a duel between Diebold voting machines and a computer hacker from Finland – with America’s democracy at stake.

‘Hacking Democracy’ was nominated for an Emmy award for Outstanding Investigative Journalism.

“Disturbing stuff. . . It’s not shocked-shocked you feel watching this; it’s genuine shock.’ – The New York Times

“It is hard to imagine a documentary that is more important to the civic life of the nation — let alone one that is so compelling and ultimately moving” – Baltimore Sun

After we filmed the ‘Hursti Hack’ California’s Secretary of State ordered an investigation. The best computer scientists at UC Berkeley analysed the Diebold voting machines’ computer source code.

The UC Berkeley Report can be found here: https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections…

 

Election Security Expert Susan Greenhalgh of Free Speech for People explains why rigging an election is easier than most people are aware

 

https://spoonamore.substack.com/p/duplicate-epollbook-checks-hand-recount

Per the above post from Cyber Security Expert Stephen Spoonamore

“The data now being certified nationwide, in my opinion, is hacked. In the world of cyber-crime (hacking an election) is a modest effort. Forget the mostly false talking point that tabulators are not networked. They are not supposed to be network accessible WHILE they are tabulating. But they are all programmed in advance, either in person or over network access. They are updated and contacted by many persons. They have, at minimum a flashdrive access.

I think many people may not understand that tabulation machines actually are pretty sophisticated and have several core functions each with different programming, risks and functions. They Scan. Interpret the Scan. Tabulate the Interpretation., Store the Scans as CVR images. And lastly compile the various runs and races and upload the outputs.

During the first process, the scan of the ballot, they just make an image. The votes are NOT counted directly from the ballot, but from a computer analysis of the SCANNED IMAGE. This is not a trivial distinction. There are counting devices for many things including currency, standardized tests, proxy votes etc which DO NOT make an image of the paper item to be sent on for interpretation by other software, but actually do “count” the tally directly from the paper itself. One reason this is important, it is relatively hard and much more labor intensive to add or subtract paper items being scanned. By contrast, from a hacker’s perspective, it is extremely easy to add or remove electronic images into a system designed to manage electronic images.

The paper ballots, become CVIs (Cast Vote Images) which are then reviewed by software to create CVRs (Cast Vote Records) This is accomplished by the CVI having scanned images with registry marks all around the edges and the software compares these registry marks with any black dots it’s sees on a page it views as a reference grid. The computer has been programmed by a vendor, to know which “dots” correspond to a bubble next to a candidates name on that elections particular points on the image grid. A dot on that correct spot on the grid, tallies a vote for that candidate or issue.

There are a number of ways to compromise this.

Part of the pitch of companies like Dominion and ES&S is their proprietary software. But both of those companies have had their software copied by GOP activists associated with Sydney Powell and others in Trump’s orbit. Copies of the software have been taken from counties in FL, GA, AZ, MI, PA, TX and CO. You can read the legal filings, concerns and numerous news articles. Functionally, at least 85% of the tabulation systems used in the US, use software duplicated by right wing activist who actively claim they have this access. Why? Just for the Lolz of wearing DvsCorp08! firmware passcode T-Shirts and offer them on Etsy?

I don’t think so.

In the hands of sophisticated hackers this software,and this system would allow a load of possible exploits. Looking at the absurd published results, all of which appear machine manufactured, not human behavious created, I think votes were injected into the system during the hours after polls have closed. I am sure the machines worked fine in the weeks before the election, and again hours after the election, but the code is in there and dormant. Only a complete audit will find it.

Let me share two similar hacks I personally helped uncover. One had scripts which swapped credit card settlement numbers from an aggregation layer of a retailer, in effect “padding” the profits of the merchant. The second had scripts written into banking check-image deposit systems which clipped parts of account numbers from check images and replaced them with alternative numbers. An insider embezzlement scheme. The required insider access and knowledge of the code. I believe both those conditions exist here as well.

Either of these strategies could be applied to the presidential vote in part of all of the swing states. A script could be added at the software layer in which the Ballot Image (CVI) is interpreted into a vote total. The script would simply look for black dots at the grid reference for Kamala, clip the dot, and then move the dot into the grid reference for Trump. The IMAGE of the ballot once changed would then be counted. As the image is then permanently altered, you can review the CVRs forever, and the false result will be forever the outcome. Alternatively, there are 100s of Gigs of storage available inside these machines allowing them to store 50,000K+ image scans of the ballots. Clever hack would be to preload sets of ballots filled out with Trump and/or all/other other race combinations could be included. As long as Trump is leading by a designated amount, the script sits dormant. Nothing happens. If Kamala begins leading, the script can start swapping out the right proportion of Kamala ballots with the prestored stock of ballot images. It can be substituted for one of the pre-loaded Trump ballots.

These are just two of numerous methods and scripts which could accomplish an outcome reversing hack of the vote. A computer will output whatever it is programmed to output, by whoever has programmed it. In both cases the number of ballots, the epollbook numbers and the number of ballot images will match. BUT if you actually hand count the ballots, you will get a different outcome from the machine stored images.

Either of my two scripts, or several others suggested by friends would only be discovered by a human recount of the original hand-marked paper ballots”.

 

Hacking Democracy Documentary

Jessica Denson from Lights On explains in this video that she left the Meidastouch Network in order to speak freely regarding her concerns about the 2024 election. She also discusses with Duncan Buell PhD, Chair Emeritus of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of South Carolina, how U.S. voting systems are vulnerable to hacking and how Trump operatives obtained copies of voting software 3 years prior to the 2024 election. Doctor Buell penned a letter with other top election security experts and sent it to the White House on 11-13-2024 alerting VP Harris that she should request recounts in swing states.

 

Jessica Denson, who owns Lights On podcast, was the first national figure to sound the alarm about the 2024 election and begged Kamala Harris to request recounts in Swing States, along with thousands of American citizens who posted their outrage on Social Media due to Harris’s failure to get recounts, as recommended by Cyber Security Experts.

Posts all over social media such as #Recount2024 show Americans knew something was drastically wrong, but Kamala Harris, Democrats, the Mainstream News Media and a large portion of the population accepted the results without asking any questions and have continued legitimizing Trump’s Presidency by failing to discuss or speak out about any of the issues which were apparent after the election was called for Trump.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kamala Harris & Democrats ignored posts on Social Media like those above. It seems Democrats would rather allow Trump to destroy our country than admit they made a mistake and take any action to correct that mistake by getting recounts in Swing States.

 

Elon’s Ex CONFIRMS He RIGGED 2024 FOR TRUMP

The mother of Elon Musk’s youngest child is confirming what we’ve been screaming from the rooftops since election night 2024. The felon illegal president who this week created a $1.8 billion slush fund for his fellow criminals was not elected by the people. As Elon’s ex and former MAGA influencer Ashley St. Clair revealed this week, Musk told her he released an “anomaly in the matrix” connected with his vast satellite network as he worked to install Trump back in the White House. Jessica Denson, who left Meidastouch to sound the alarm about the 2024 election is joined for the first time by Tania of “This Will Hold,” the viral Substack account that has been tracking technological interference in 2024 like few others. They connect the dots on St. Clair’s revelations, plus explain the brand new reporting on how this all ties into the Trump-Epstein criminal network.

 

An ex-CIA agent claims he was part of a forensic audit that shows Kamala Harris won the 2024 election by a wide margin. In this special episode of Lights On, Jessica Denson addresses the Substack reporting this, multiple other reports on manipulation in the 2024 election, and draws vital connections with Kamala Harris’s recent interview with Stephen Colbert, with a special emphasis on the transformative power of Love and how it can set us free.

 

Jessica Denson from Lights On podcast, recalls with Marilyn Marks (Director for Coalition of Good Governance) being one of the Security Experts who penned the letter to Kamala Harris, urging her to get recounts in Swing States days after the 2024 election was called for Trump. Denson discusses having leave the MeidasTouch Network which hosted her YouTube channel, in order to speak freely regarding her concerns. Denson mentions hearing that Democrat attorney Marc Elias is the person she heard was most responsible for Kamala Harris not getting recounts.

Marilyn Marks talks about getting a threatening call from a Trump operative, which she secretly recorded, in which he admits to scanning equipment and copying hard drives in Coffee County, GA

 

Trump’s Illegitimate Presidency discussed by Jessica Denson

Every member of Congress who helped Trump to become President and Supreme Court Justice John Roberts who swore Trump in as President violated their own Oath of Office because Trump was disqualified by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for inciting an Insurrection on J6, 2021. He also made it clear that he intended violate laws, the United States Constitution and Citizens Rights by threatening to lock up political opponents, go after people who criticized him, saying news outlets which criticized him should be shut down (proof he planned on violating the 1st Amendment), pursue revenge and retribution against those who held him accountable in the past and anyone who tries to hold him accountable in the future. Trump made more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish perceived enemies, therefore he should not have been sworn in as President [source: 100 Threats by Trump to prosecute enemies;  npr.org/2024/10/21/nx-s1-5134924/trump-election-2024-kamala-harris-elizabeth-cheney-threat-civil-liberties]

 

How Congress Can INVALIDATE Trump 2.0 Immediately

 

Pro-Democracy Media?

Jessica Denson challenges her former network Meidastouch to use their massive influence to summon the masses to Washington on 3.14.

Was Thomas Massie’s Election Rigged? Suspicious how Ed Gallrein, who nobody ever heard of doubled turnout from 2024 to 2026 and increased the vote total by 357%, the highest overall vote total in Kentucky history. Plus, Trump wanted Massie punished and removed from congress for voting to have the Epstein files released.

It’s also suspicious how those who crosses Trump gets primaried and remove from congress, such as Representative Al Greene who lost to a primary challenge.

 

Iran Releases Proof Thomas Massie’s Election Was Rigged

 

 

 

Massie increased his turnout by 19% over 2024. Gallrein increased the opposition turnout by 357%! Today’s turnout DOUBLED 2024’s in the highest overall vote total in Kentucky history. Was this really driven by “get out the vote”?

Are we really supposed to believe the Boomers flooded the polls so hard that they overwhelmed every other demographic?Gallrein didn’t do any debates and no grassroots showed up to his campaign events at all. But we’re supposed to believe they came out to vote for him in record numbers? Massie also massively outraised Gallrein in small dollar donations in both totals and number of donors. This is a huge signal for voter enthusiasm. But we’re supposed to believe that Gallrein’s seniors & [fewer small donors] doubled the turnout from 2024

 

 

https://x.com/BasedSamParker/status/2056978079235678307?s=20

Small party for a historic record-breaking turnout!

 

Kentucky 2026 Republican Primary CD4 Shows Statistical Anomalies Warranting Investigation

 

Did Trump have Thomas Massie’s Election RIGGED?

 

https://x.com/Ryanmatta/status/2058284389335814358?s=20

This is how Israel rigged Thomas Massie’s election in Kentucky

 

https://x.com/drhossamsamy65/status/2058942784007033104?s=20

Daniel McAdams confirms the Zionist lobby completely stole Thomas Massie’s primary election

He reveals the sudden spike in opposition votes has a statistical probability of basically zero. The establishment is blatantly orchestrating massive election fraud

 

https://x.com/tpvsean/status/2057915946166100113?s=20

Iran Releases Proof Thomas Massie Election Was Rigged by Israel to Protect Pedophile Blackmail Op

American elections are compromised – and now we have the proof. The Iranian hackers who breached Israel’s intelligence servers have dropped receipts that should terrify every voter.

 

 

Election Truth Alliance Identifies Signals of Strong Electoral Fraud

Releases Kentucky Election Forensics Analysis for Rep. Massie v. Gallrein

The Election Truth Alliance (ETA), a team of over 50  cyber security experts, statisticians, and analysts dedicated to election transparency, has released a new analysis of the 2026 Republican primary in Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District. The report highlights statistical anomalies that the ETA believes warrant public oversight and transparent investigations.

The ETA does not allege wrongdoing. Rather, they identify statistically significant patterns in the data that call for merit investigation from election administrators.

 

Key Findings

1. Turnout doubled compared to 2024 — in a non‑Presidential year.
   • Republican participation doubled from 52,593 in 2024 to 105,361 in 2026, despite 2024 being a Presidential cycle. Democratic turnout did not experience a similar increase.
2. District‑level results looked normal; county‑level results did not.
   • The ETA’s heat maps, vote‑share distributions, and Benford‑type tests appear normal when aggregated at the district level. However, the county‑level Klimek et al. (2012) fraud fingerprint calculations show elevated fraud signals for both candidates across nearly all counties. This could indicate intention to mask fraudulent activity.
3. Both candidates’ county‑level fraud fingerprints move in parallel.
   • The ETA’s side‑by‑side county comparison shows Massie and Gallrein’s fingerprint values tracking each other with unusual consistency. ETA analysts note that this pattern persists even after controlling for demographics.
4. Precinct‑size analyses show opposite patterns for the two candidates.
   • The ETA’s precinct‑size (measured as the number of registered Republicans in that precinct) regressions indicate:
     • Massie’s vote share is elevated in the smaller precincts and depressed in the larger precincts.
     • Gallrein’s vote share is depressed in the smaller precincts and elevated in the larger precincts.
   • The ETA describes this as consistent with a fixed vote addition for Massie and a proportional vote addition for both Gallrein and Massie, albeit at different rates.
     • The small fixed-addition of votes (estimated 2 per precinct) would be too small to affect the outcome of the election, but may have served to distort the proportional relationship between the two candidates and avoid detection under standard forensic methods.
     • If proportional votes were added to each candidate, it was at different rates, steadily widening Gallrein’s vote margin relative to Massie as precincts grew larger, potentially influencing the outcome of the election.
5. Voter registration numbers have unexpected predictive power.
   • The ETA’s regression analyses show that voter registration remains a statistically significant predictor of both candidates’ totals even after turnout is fully controlled. Under normal tabulation, registration should not influence final vote totals once actual votes are counted. Instead, this would be consistent with registration having served as a potential input into the calculation of final vote totals.
6. Vote share charts show inconsistent patterns across Election Day vs. mail‑in ballots
   • The ETA’s analysis points to different anomalous patterns operating across different voting methods — with each method appearing unusual in at least one test. These inconsistencies are difficult to attribute to genuine voter behavior in a closed Republican primary after accounting for demographics.

 

The ETA’s Position

The ETA stresses that these findings are not proof of fraud. They are statistical irregularities that merit deeper investigation.

“The combination of clean district‑level results and flagged county‑level fraud signatures suggest that aggregation may be masking underlying patterns,” the ETA writes. “We are calling for transparency via hand recounts.”

What the ETA Is Requesting

The ETA is asking for:

• Election officials to allow a hand count of all paper ballot records from the Kentucky 4th District Republican primary;
• Public, independent oversight of the hand count;
• Transparency around the tabulation processes/ballot chain of custody; and,
• Commitment to elevated security measures to protect against the risk of digital vote manipulation in future elections

The ETA has made its full report available on their website and on Substack; data tables and visualizations are available on their website.

https://electiontruthalliance.substack.com/p/we-dug-into-data-for-the-2026-kentucky

 

Appendices: 2026 Kentucky Republican Primary

 

Nathan Taylor, Executive Director of Public Engagement, is available for interviews to discuss the organization’s findings and the broader need for independent election verification. He is a cybersecurity professional and Army veteran.

The organization emphasizes that election certification is not the same as election verification. Certification confirms that procedural steps were followed, whereas verification confirms that the results are accurate. The ETA’s mission is to bridge that gap.

 

https://electiontruthalliance.substack.com/p/lev-remembers-live-were-the-2024 NATHAN TAYLOR WITH LEV PARNAS June 5 2026

Kentucky-based Nathan Taylor from Election Truth Alliance with Jessica Denson: https://www.youtube.com/live/2HQhpS1peUE
Recent Short: https://youtube.com/shorts/naQmSCb6EKo

 

https://dearscotland.substack.com/p/was-the-election-stolen-from-thomas

 

Dr Beth Clarkson, a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer with a PhD in Statistics, stated she found patterns indicative of manipulation in elections and voting machines; “not just an anomaly that occurred in one place, but a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the U.S.”

 

Per the above article: NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections

Analysis of recent election data has revealed a worrying pattern of potential fraud. In states where the margin of victory is less than 10%, the same mathematical formula has been found to consistently result in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican. This has been the case in federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial elections since 2008, and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.

The five major voting machine companies have all been found to have close financial ties to the GOP, raising questions of conflict of interest. Tagg Romney, son of the former presidential candidate, has denied any such conflict, despite his investment in Hart Intercivic and Diebold.

A retired NSA analyst has applied a simple formula to election results in Arizona, and found evidence of systemic and coordinated election fraud on a large scale. However, this appears to be limited to larger precincts, as anomalies in smaller precincts are more easily detected.

“Easy to Cheat”

Michael Duniho, a retired NSA analyst, has spent the past seven years investigating voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. His research has focused on a 2006 RTA Bond issue election, which has been subject to much discussion in the media. According to Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, since you can’t see what is going on in the machine.”

Duniho applied a mathematical model to the voting results from the largest precincts in Arizona and found that the Republican candidate in every election since 2008 had gained 8-10% in the polls, while the Democratic candidate had lost 8-10%. This swing of up to 20 points could be enough to swing an election, unless the candidate was already losing badly.

Duniho, with decades of experience in deciphering large amounts of data for the NSA, was determined to understand why this pattern was only occurring in the largest precincts.

Nose Counting

Francois Choquette and James Johnson have uncovered an intriguing phenomenon in the February Republican primary contest in South Carolina. An unusually large number of votes were cast for Mitt Romney in larger precincts, while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward. This prompted Choquette to examine the results in all 50 states, where he found a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP in all states except Utah. Further investigation revealed that Romney had used the same technique against John McCain in Maricopa County in 2008, although McCain’s lead was too large to be affected.

Given the sheer scale of the task, Choquette has provided a set of instructions to enable others to replicate the analysis in their own county or state. The implications of this research could be far-reaching and Choquette’s work is certainly worthy of further examination.

Stealing Votes

Analysis of voting patterns in Arizona has revealed a significant discrepancy between the size of precincts and the results of the election. According to Professor Duniho, if the percentages of votes remained consistent between precincts, the trend line would be flat. However, the reality is that the lines slope downwards for Democrats and upwards for Republicans. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the 2012 Presidential primary, where votes for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul were systematically bled off and credited to Mitt Romney. After Duniho’s spreadsheet was completed, the actual vote totals from other Arizona election contests were compared, further confirming the discrepancy.

Analysis of the 2010 elections in Arizona has revealed evidence of manipulation. From Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, the trends lines all indicated that a single individual had inserted a program into the system’s central computer, flipping votes. The results were astonishing: Governor Brewer had actually lost her election and Gabby Gifford’s slim victory over Tea Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was much greater than the reported 1%.

John Duniho, a political analyst, has called for strong hand count audits to confirm the integrity of the elections. This would involve comparing hand counts to the official reports. Such measures are essential to ensure the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Ohio Precedent

For years, Republicans have been accused of vote tampering in elections. In 2004, the presidential election in Ohio and Florida brought these allegations to the forefront. In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell was accused of creating a computer program with a trap door that shifted Democratic votes to the Republican Party. Connell was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Department of Justice to provide Connell with security due to two threats made against his life by people associated with Karl Rove. Tragically, Connell was killed in a plane crash before the trial began.

In Florida, the University of California at Berkeley’s Quantitative Methods Research Team conducted a study that found anomalies between Florida counties using touch-screen voting and those using other methods that could not be explained statistically. The study showed that counties using electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who conducted the study, said that the evidence was too strong to ignore, noting that the probability of such evidence occurring where the true difference is zero is less than once in a thousand chances.

Don’t Trust, Verify

The integrity of the upcoming US election is under scrutiny after an analysis by statistician Richard Duniho found evidence of vote-flipping. This could only be possible if computerized voting machines were programmed to steal votes. Calls to conduct hand counts of ballots by precinct to verify the results have been unsuccessful in Pima County, Arizona, where anomalies were first detected in 2006. With the election just 12 days away, it is unclear whether a judge will be willing to reverse past trends and permit access to ballots.

The implications of this are concerning. More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots, believing their vote will be fairly counted. If the analysis is correct, criminals could be stealing up to 10% of votes without consequence. This could have a significant impact on the outcome of the election, which is much closer than in 2008 when President Obama won by a large margin. It is essential that the American democratic system is not undermined by another election crisis, raising questions over the last three national Presidential election results.

Don’t Take Our Word

As the US election results continue to pour in, the need for accuracy and transparency has never been greater. In the UK, paper ballots are used and the final outcome can take up to three days to be finalized. This is because every ballot is transparently hand-counted, providing citizens with the assurance that their votes are counted accurately.

The Justice Department’s insistence that results must be reported by 11 pm for the television networks is not only misguided, but irresponsible. It is time for Americans to demand hand ballot counts, and to reject the notion of being victimized by vote fraud. The news that Serbia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are sending election monitors to watch the US election is a stark reminder of the need for accuracy and transparency in this process. It is time for Americans to take control of their own destiny and ensure that their votes are counted accurately.

 

Videos and info on this page show how Republicans have been using voter suppression, voter purges, voter challenges, Gerrymandering and other unscrupulous anti-democratic tactics to rig elections for the past 50 years

 

To Republicans, winning at all costs is a “Zero Sum Game”. They know the only way they can win, is to cheat and play dirty

 

 

 

 

Since Republicans represents the RICH and PRIVILEGED, they feel ENTITLED and above the law to do what ever they want and what ever it takes to get their way.

 

RedShift: How The GOP Rigged Our Elections

Writer / Author Thom Hartmann discusses how Republicans have been rigging elections for the past 50 years and how exit polls in states like Florida showed Hillary Clinton winning the 2016 election.

 

Cheri Jacobus, who worked in Republican politics for decades, was an RNC spokesperson, political strategist, pundit & writer, verifies Author Thom Hartmann claims and states in the above video; “Donald Trump has never won a Presidential election legitimately”.

Cheri discusses a host of bombshell issues, including; Trump never legitimately won a Presidential election (2016 & 2024), how COVID and mail-in ballots derailed Republicans plans to rig & steal the 2020 election, why right before the 2020 election expensive high speed mail sorting machines were trashed and Putin’s involvement in helping to put Trump in the White House.

 

Dr Beth Clarkson, a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer with a PhD in Statistics, stated she found patterns indicative of manipulation in voting machines which goes across multiple states and election cycles.

“This is not just an anomaly that occurred in one place,” Clarkson said. “It is a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the United States. The pattern could be voter fraud or a demographic trend that has not been picked up by extensive polling, she said.

“I do not know why this trend is there, but I know that the pattern is there and one way to establish that it is or is not election fraud is to go and do a physical audit of paper records of voting machines,” she said.

Clarkson became more interested in the issue after reading a paper written by statisticians Francois Choquette and James Johnson in 2012 of the Republican primary results showing strong statistical evidence of election manipulation in Iowa, New Hampshire, Arizona, Ohio, Oklahoma, Alabama, Louisiana, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Kentucky.

Clarkson said she couldn’t believe their findings, so she checked their math and found it was correct and checked their model selection and found it appropriate. And then she pulled additional data from other elections they hadn’t analyzes and found the same pattern”. [source: cjonline.com/story/news/politics/state/2015/04/01/wichita-state-mathematician-sues-kris-kobach-sedgwick-county-elections-commisioner/16633765007]

 

Per the above article: NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections

Analysis of recent election data has revealed a worrying pattern of potential fraud. In states where the margin of victory is less than 10%, the same mathematical formula has been found to consistently result in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican. This has been the case in federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial elections since 2008, and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.

The five major voting machine companies have all been found to have close financial ties to the GOP, raising questions of conflict of interest. Tagg Romney, son of the former presidential candidate, has denied any such conflict, despite his investment in Hart Intercivic and Diebold.

A retired NSA analyst has applied a simple formula to election results in Arizona, and found evidence of systemic and coordinated election fraud on a large scale. However, this appears to be limited to larger precincts, as anomalies in smaller precincts are more easily detected.

“Easy to Cheat”

Michael Duniho, a retired NSA analyst, has spent the past seven years investigating voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. His research has focused on a 2006 RTA Bond issue election, which has been subject to much discussion in the media. According to Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, since you can’t see what is going on in the machine.”

Duniho applied a mathematical model to the voting results from the largest precincts in Arizona and found that the Republican candidate in every election since 2008 had gained 8-10% in the polls, while the Democratic candidate had lost 8-10%. This swing of up to 20 points could be enough to swing an election, unless the candidate was already losing badly.

Duniho, with decades of experience in deciphering large amounts of data for the NSA, was determined to understand why this pattern was only occurring in the largest precincts.

Nose Counting

Francois Choquette and James Johnson have uncovered an intriguing phenomenon in the February Republican primary contest in South Carolina. An unusually large number of votes were cast for Mitt Romney in larger precincts, while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward. This prompted Choquette to examine the results in all 50 states, where he found a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP in all states except Utah. Further investigation revealed that Romney had used the same technique against John McCain in Maricopa County in 2008, although McCain’s lead was too large to be affected.

Given the sheer scale of the task, Choquette has provided a set of instructions to enable others to replicate the analysis in their own county or state. The implications of this research could be far-reaching and Choquette’s work is certainly worthy of further examination.

Stealing Votes

Analysis of voting patterns in Arizona has revealed a significant discrepancy between the size of precincts and the results of the election. According to Professor Duniho, if the percentages of votes remained consistent between precincts, the trend line would be flat. However, the reality is that the lines slope downwards for Democrats and upwards for Republicans. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the 2012 Presidential primary, where votes for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul were systematically bled off and credited to Mitt Romney. After Duniho’s spreadsheet was completed, the actual vote totals from other Arizona election contests were compared, further confirming the discrepancy.

Analysis of the 2010 elections in Arizona has revealed evidence of manipulation. From Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, the trends lines all indicated that a single individual had inserted a program into the system’s central computer, flipping votes. The results were astonishing: Governor Brewer had actually lost her election and Gabby Gifford’s slim victory over Tea Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was much greater than the reported 1%.

John Duniho, a political analyst, has called for strong hand count audits to confirm the integrity of the elections. This would involve comparing hand counts to the official reports. Such measures are essential to ensure the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Ohio Precedent

For years, Republicans have been accused of vote tampering in elections. In 2004, the presidential election in Ohio and Florida brought these allegations to the forefront. In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell was accused of creating a computer program with a trap door that shifted Democratic votes to the Republican Party. Connell was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Department of Justice to provide Connell with security due to two threats made against his life by people associated with Karl Rove. Tragically, Connell was killed in a plane crash before the trial began.

In Florida, the University of California at Berkeley’s Quantitative Methods Research Team conducted a study that found anomalies between Florida counties using touch-screen voting and those using other methods that could not be explained statistically. The study showed that counties using electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who conducted the study, said that the evidence was too strong to ignore, noting that the probability of such evidence occurring where the true difference is zero is less than once in a thousand chances.

Don’t Trust, Verify

The integrity of the upcoming US election is under scrutiny after an analysis by statistician Richard Duniho found evidence of vote-flipping. This could only be possible if computerized voting machines were programmed to steal votes. Calls to conduct hand counts of ballots by precinct to verify the results have been unsuccessful in Pima County, Arizona, where anomalies were first detected in 2006. With the election just 12 days away, it is unclear whether a judge will be willing to reverse past trends and permit access to ballots.

The implications of this are concerning. More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots, believing their vote will be fairly counted. If the analysis is correct, criminals could be stealing up to 10% of votes without consequence. This could have a significant impact on the outcome of the election, which is much closer than in 2008 when President Obama won by a large margin. It is essential that the American democratic system is not undermined by another election crisis, raising questions over the last three national Presidential election results.

Don’t Take Our Word

As the US election results continue to pour in, the need for accuracy and transparency has never been greater. In the UK, paper ballots are used and the final outcome can take up to three days to be finalized. This is because every ballot is transparently hand-counted, providing citizens with the assurance that their votes are counted accurately.

The Justice Department’s insistence that results must be reported by 11 pm for the television networks is not only misguided, but irresponsible. It is time for Americans to demand hand ballot counts, and to reject the notion of being victimized by vote fraud. The news that Serbia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are sending election monitors to watch the US election is a stark reminder of the need for accuracy and transparency in this process. It is time for Americans to take control of their own destiny and ensure that their votes are counted accurately.

 

 

ElectionTruthAllience.org obtained voting data from Minnesota going back to 1984, before Electronic Voting was used in elections. They found that up until 2012, elections looked relatively clean. 2016 is when abnormal voting data spiked, as showed in the above graphs.

 

In the above video, computer programmer (Clint Curtis) testified to a congressional committee that in October of 2000, he wrote a program for a prominent Florida Republican (Tom Feeney, who was Speaker of the House, per testimony in the above video) which could flip votes and be undetectable. In September 2006, Feeney was named one of the “20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress”.

This shows Republicans history of efforts to rig / flip elections so it would be undetectable.   Also, many voting machines and software is made by Republican owners.

 

Full testimony of veteran computer programmer Clint Curtis, at a U.S. Congressional Hearing about being contacted by a Florida Republican to rig elections

 

CAUGHT ON TAPE Listen to Trump 2020 Lawyer Admit to Voter Suppression by the Republican Party”

 

Republicans have been using unscrupulous, treasonous tactics to rig and steal elections for over 50 years.

 

GOP’s History of Treasonous Tactics to Win Elections

By the time of the election in November 1968, LBJ had evidence Nixon had sabotaged the Vietnam war peace talks. Nixon feared a breakthrough at the Paris Peace talks designed to find a negotiated settlement to the Vietnam war, and he knew this would derail his campaign. In late October 1968 there were major concessions from Hanoi which promised to allow meaningful talks to get underway in Paris – concessions that would justify Johnson calling for a complete bombing halt of North Vietnam. To sabotage these efforts, Nixon set up a clandestine back-channel involving Anna Chennault, a senior campaign adviser, who convinced the South Vietnamese pull out of peace talks, with promises of them getting a better deal if Nixon was elected President. This helped Nixon get elected, resulting in the war dragging on years afterwards, causing the unnecessary deaths of thousands of U.S. Troops and the deaths of South Vietnamese.

Members of Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign covertly negotiated with Iranian leaders to undermine incumbent President Jimmy Carter by delaying the release of 66 American hostages detained in Iran. This deal with Iran caused the delay the release of American hostages for a year past the time they could have been released, to help Reagan win the 1980 election. This became known as the 1980 “October Surprise”.  The hostage situation, which began when Iranian revolutionaries seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran, was one of the biggest news stories of 1980, and Carter’s inability to resolve it is widely believed to have contributed to his loss. We now know the reason President Carter was unable to negotiate the release of the hostages was due to Reagan’s presidential campaign covertly negotiating with Iranian leaders, promising not to release them until after Reagan was elected.

 

Nixon Prolonged the Vietnam War to get elected President, which cost thousand of lives

 

 

Nixon ran on a platform that opposed the Vietnam war, but to win the election, he needed the war to continue

In 1968, the Paris Peace talks, intended to put an end to the 13-year-long Vietnam War, failed because an aide working for then-Presidential candidate Richard Nixon convinced the South Vietnamese to walk away from the dealings, says a new report by the BBC’s David Taylor. By the late 1960s Americans had been involved in the Vietnam War for nearly a decade, and the ongoing conflict was an incredibly contentious issue, says PBS:

In 1967, with American troop strength in Vietnam reaching 500,000, protest against U.S. participation in the Vietnam War had grown stronger as growing numbers of Americans questioned whether the U.S. war effort could succeed or was morally justifiable. They took their protests to the streets in peace marches, demonstrations, and acts of civil disobedience. Despite the country’s polarization, the balance of American public opinion was beginning to sway toward “de-escalation” of the war.

Nixon feared a breakthrough at the Paris Peace talks designed to find a negotiated settlement to the Vietnam war, and he knew this would derail his campaign.

In late October 1968 there were major concessions from Hanoi which promised to allow meaningful talks to get underway in Paris – concessions that would justify Johnson calling for a complete bombing halt of North Vietnam. This was exactly what Nixon feared.

President Johnson had at the time a habit of recording all of his phone conversations, and newly released tapes from 1968 detailed that the FBI had “bugged” the telephones of the South Vietnamese ambassador and of Anna Chennault, one of Nixon’s aides. Nixon records show that in 1968, as a presidential candidate, he used Anna Chennault as his liaison in Vietnam, to persuade them to refuse a cease-fire being brokered by President Lyndon Johnson. This was done to hurt Democratic Presidential candidate Hubert Humphrey and help Nixon.

In the recently released tapes, we can hear Johnson being told about Nixon’s interference by Defence Secretary Clark Clifford. The FBI had bugged the South Vietnamese ambassadors phone. They had Chennault lobbying the ambassador on tape. Johnson was justifiably furious — he ordered Nixon’s campaign be placed under FBI surveillance. Johnson passed along a note to Nixon that he knew about the move. Nixon played like he had no idea why the South backed out, and offered to travel to Saigon to get them back to the negotiating table.

Though the basic story of Nixon’s involvement in stalling the Vietnam peace talks has been around before, the new tapes, says the Atlantic Wire, describe how President Johnson knew all about the on-goings but chose not to bring them to the public’s attention: he thought that his intended successor, Hubert Humphrey, was going to beat Nixon in the upcoming election anyway. And, by revealing that he knew about Nixon’s dealings, he’d also have to admit to having spied on the South Vietnamese ambassador.

Johnson was livid. He even called the Republican Senate Minority Leader, Everett Dirksen to complain that “they oughtn’t be doing this. This is treason.” “I know,” was Dirksen’s feeble reply.

Eventually, Nixon won by just 1 percent of the popular vote. “Once in office he escalated the war into Laos and Cambodia, with the loss of an additional 22,000 American lives, before finally settling for a peace agreement in 1973 that was within grasp in 1968,” says the BBC.

This treason cost many lives. To Nixon, getting elected was more important than the lives of our Troops or Vietnamese people. Lack of empathy and decency seems to be a common trait of Right Wingers, such as Nixon, Reagan and Trump.

 

REPUBLICAN RIGGING ELECTIONS BY GERRYMANDERING

Republicans have been Rigging Elections by Gerrymandering for years

Through Gerrymandering, Republicans has made it almost impossible to be removed from office in some districts. Since they feel safe from being removed from office, they have no motivation to compromise. They are pursuing radical right wing agendas such as cutting assistance to the poor, cutting planned parenthood funding and passing anti-aborting “War on Women” legislation when the majority of Americans do not support these policies.

 

Republicans War on Democracy began in 2010 when they began hyper-gerrymandering every state they took control of. Republicans injected $30 million, much of it from dark money, often targeting vulnerable blue state Democrats in races that wouldn’t otherwise draw a lot of national funding.  The plan was called REDMAP

 

GOP Redistricting Is Undermining Democracy In State Legislatures

Despite stinging statewide defeats in 2018, 2020, and 2022, Republicans are still calling the shots in Wisconsin — all because of GOP redistricting, which is undermining democracy. Ben Wikler, chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party, joins Mehdi to discuss.

 

When the midterm elections were done, Republicans had gained unilateral control of 11 state legislatures, upping their total to 25. Between then and the 2012 elections, GOP lawmakers in these states had largely undisputed power over redrawing congressional districts. This helped allow Republicans to maintain control of the House, even though Democrats received over 1 million more votes.

The Republican State Leadership Committee issued a memo stating “Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policy making at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.”

 

Rigged: The Voter Suppression Playbook chronicles how our right to vote is being undercut by a decade of unscrupulous tactics by Republicans, including the partisan use of gerrymandering and voter purges, and the weakening of the Voting Rights Act by the Supreme Court. The film captures real-time voter purges in North Carolina and voter intimidation in Texas.

The documentary was principally filmed during the 2016 election and exposes the nefarious playbook of voter suppression tactics being used to subvert the growing demographic tide of non-white and younger voters from fully participating in America’s democracy.

 

Gerrymandering to the Supreme Court | LET’S CONNECT THE DOTS

Every 10 years, congressional district maps are redrawn based on the new census data on the population. This process, known as redistricting, is taking place across the country right now. This episode of LET’S CONNECT draws a line from the beginnings of redistricting in this country, following different attempts by Congress and the courts to regulate the process, and connects this history to how Supreme Court decisions have and are having an effect on redistricting today.

 

GOP Gerrymandering: Democratic Votes Not Matched By Seats Gained

Rachel Maddow shows four states in which Democratic popular vote victories are not commensurate with representative legislative seats because Republican gerrymandering has tipped the playing field.

 

Supreme Court Dominated by Republican “Justices” Hands GOP Big Victory by Gerrymandering, Ensuring Massive Election Rigging

 

REPUBLICAN DOMINATED Supreme Court Just Legalized Partisan Gerrymandering and Violating Democracy

 

Republicans are destroying democracy by Gerrymandering districts. As you can see from the graph above, a disproportionate number of Republicans were “elected” in relation to votes cast.

 

 

The Republican Dominated Supreme Court “Justices” Legalized Partisan Gerrymandering by making sure Republicans can cement their stranglehold in States they control and never be voted out of office. This is how Anti-Democratic Authoritarian Fascist take over counties (such as Hungary) and Eliminate Democracy.

 

How The GOP Manipulated Ohio Elections

After winning single-party control of the state in the 2010 elections, Ohio Republicans set out to redraw the state’s congressional map to their advantage. What unfolded is one of the most egregious examples of partisan gerrymandering in modern history. Rather than working through the official legislative process which involved a bipartisan task force, Ohio Republicans and national GOP operatives rented a secret hotel room in Columbus, known as “The Bunker.” They designed a map that would give Republicans a 12-4 advantage over Democrats, when it came to “winning” districts, and therefore, congressional seats. This unconstitutional, partisan advantage is locked in until 2022, unless stopped.

 

Ohio Gerrymandering Battle Explained

 

Why New 2021 Ohio Redistricting Maps Are An ‘Insult To Democracy’

CNN’s John Avlon breaks down how the “rigged” redistricting process in Ohio is engineered to help the Republican Party achieve an electoral majority.

 

Democrats won 20 million More Votes and Lost

The United States constitution is severely flawed when more often than not in the last few elections the majority of people voting for a particular party did not receive their relative representation. Democrats received 20 million more votes in the Senate than Republicans in 2014, yet Republicans won big.

The same occurred in the House of Representatives in 2012.

House Democrats out-earned their Republican counterparts by 1.17 million votes. Read another way, Democrats won 50.59 percent of the two-party vote. Still, they won just 46.21 percent of seats, leaving the Republicans with 234 seats and Democrats with 201.

Full article at egbertowillies.com/2015/01/04/amazing-democrats-won-20-million-votes-lost/

 

 

 

 

Politicians picking their voters is unconstitutional. Gerrymandering is an assault on Democracy.

This is yet another example of how Republicans rig elections… how they don’t give a damn about the will of the American people and how they use tactics to win, regardless of how unethical and unscrupulous the tactics may be.

UNTIL GERRYMANDERING IS MADE ILLEGAL, THERE WILL BE NO DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA

 

 

https://www.vox.com/2018/1/22/16920636/pennsylvania-gerrymander-ruling-house

 

https://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/07/11/3459082/florida-court-declares-one-of-the-worst-partisan-gerrymanders-in-the-country-unconstitutional

Florida Court Declares One Of The Worst Partisan Gerrymanders In The Country Unconstitutional

 

REPUBLICANS RIGGING ELECTIONS BY VOTER PURGES

The Party Of Voter Suppression

The Republican effort to make it harder to vote continues unabated, with hundreds of thousands purged from voter rolls in two key states. Aired on 12/17/19.

 

 

2000 ELECTION RIGGED

The 2000 election was rigged before the first vote was cast

Jeb Bush was the Republican Governor of the State of Florida and brother of the Republican Presidential candidate George W. Bush. Republican Secretary of State, Katherine Harris was also co-chair of Bush’s Florida campaign, clearly a conflict of interest in conducting a fair and impartial election. Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris promised to “Deliver Florida” to George W. Bush as reported in numerous newspaper articles.

 

Secretary of State, Katherine Harris and Governor Jeb Bush had the motive and the means to make sure Florida’s decisive electoral votes were “delivered” to George W. Bush. They accomplished this by illegally purging thousands of black voters off of the Florida voter rolls, ensuring an unfair advantage to George W. Bush, as shown in the above video.

 

As shown in the “2000 Election Rigged for Bush” video, ChoicePoint / DBT was given a $4 million no-bid contract under the Jeb Bush administration which wrongly and illegally purged thousands of African Americans from the Florida voter rolls.

According to the Brennan Center for Justice “Florida registrants were purged from the rolls if 80 percent of the letters of their last names were the same as those of persons with criminal convictions. Those wrongly purged included Reverend Willie D. Whiting Jr., who, under the matching criteria, was considered the same person as Willie J. Whiting. Without specific guidelines for or limitations on the authority of election officials conducting purges, eligible voters are regularly made unnecessarily vulnerable”.

As it turned out, almost everyone on the Florida purged voters list had the right to vote.

 

Antonin Scalia and his radical right wing majority of 5 “justices” subverted democracy & engaged in partisan politics by stopping the 2000 election vote count. The above video explains the shocking details.

This allowed George W. Bush to be installed as President. At the time the votes were stopped by the Supreme Court, there were only 154 votes separating Al Gore from George W. Bush.

With only 154 votes separating Al Gore from George W. Bush,  it’s easy to see how purging thousands of black voters being off of the Florida voter rolls rigged the 2000 election and handed it to George W. Bush on a Silver Platter.

If all of the illegally disqualified voters had been allowed to vote and all votes counted, the total votes would have decisively shown Al Gore to be the winner of the State of Florida and therefore the Presidency.

It was Jeb Bush’s illegal voter purge and Republicans who subverted Democracy by not allowing the votes to be counted that caused the installation of George W. Bush and the US to have a radical right wing majority in the Supreme Court.

 

Let’s not forget that Al Gore received 543,895 more votes than George W. Bush.  Al Gore was the majority of American’s choice for president so Democracy was violated and the American people got SCREWED and CHEATED.

 

 

REPUBLICANS DETERMINED TO STOP THE VOTE COUNT, OBSTRUCTED DEMOCRACY

As stated in the above article, “John Bolton was one of the pack of lawyers for the Republican presidential ticket who repeatedly sought to shut down recounts of the ballots from Florida counties before those counts revealed that Gore had actually won the state’s electoral votes and the presidency”.

“Miami-Dade County Elections Supervisor David Leahy argued at the time that 2,257 voters had apparently attempted to mark ballot cards for Gore or Bush but had not had them recorded because they had been improperly inserted into the voting machines. A hand count of those ballots revealed that 302 more of them would have gone for Gore than Bush. That shift in the numbers from just one of Florida’s 67 counties would have erased more than half of Bush’s 537-vote lead in the state”.

“But attempts to conduct a hand count were repeatedly blocked by the Bush-Cheney team, culminating with Bolton’s December 9 announcement that, “I’m here to stop the count.” A few days later, the U.S. Supreme Court would stop the count permanently, with a pro-Bush ruling in which five Republican-appointed justices, in the words of noted attorney Vincent Bugliosi, “committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law.”

 

2000 Election GOP House Thugs “Brooks Brothers Riot” also helped stop the Florida Recount which might have declared Al Gore the winner.

 

In this clip from the 2015 CNN documentary Bush v Gore, John “Mac” Stipanovich admits Republicans were determined to stop the vote count to make sure George W. Bush was installed as President, with no regard for Democracy or the will of the American people.

 

According to Lance deHaven-Smith, in his book entitled The Battle for Florida…

“Top Republicans used the powers of their offices to inject partisanship and instill fear down through the ranks of the state bureaucracy. In 1998 political operatives working for the Speaker of the house secretly examined voter registration records to learn the party affiliations of specific state employees and to identify agencies with high concentrations of Democrats”.

After it was determined that the most Democratic agency in the state government was the Florida Department of education, the department was restructured and the positions of many of its employees were eliminated. Florida law forbids any consideration of partisan orientations in state hiring, firing, and contracting, but it fails to contemplate the more sinister possibility that highly partisan elected officials might purge the state bureaucracy indirectly by reorganization and privatization.”

According to hermes-press.com,  “No sooner had he taken the oath of office than Jeb Bush began ferreting out and replacing Democrats throughout Florida state government, his first purge of Democratic voters.

Jeb and his cohorts let special interests know that they expected political donations of $2 for every $1 donated to Democrats or defaulters would lose access to the governor and the legislative leadership.

 

On Election Day 2000, rich white Republican voters stood in short lines and used up-to-date equipment, including electronic machines that let them correct their ballots.

African-American Voters Blocked from Reaching Polling Places by Police Roadblocks

Things were different in black districts. Some voters were flagged down at roadblocks, where highway patrol officers checked their drivers’ licenses. (Click here for more details)

Others waited in long lines for an inadequate number of booths and ancient recording equipment. All too often, innocent citizens whose names appeared on the ex-felons list were informed for the first time that they could not vote when they showed up at the polling place.

Some votes were simply trashed by ballot handlers. In Duval County, 27,000 ballots were discarded, over half of them from black precincts in Jacksonville. No official challenges were filed within the 72-hour time limit, so thousands of mostly Democratic votes were lost. Sixteen-thousand votes for Gore disappeared overnight from the ongoing Volusia County tally and were reinstated only when an election supervisor questioned the subtraction of already registered votes. No voting machine company representative or election official was able to explain what happened.

Greg Palast, an award-winning American reporter based in England, broke the story of the scrub list and documented its sleazy origins in The Observer, London, November 26, 2000. Updates, as well as each edition of The Best Democracy Money Can Buy have added irrefutable, hard evidence of fraud. (Palast’s most recent estimate of all qualified Florida voters barred from casting a ballot in Election 2000 stands at 90,000.)

The story was huge in Europe, but the American press ignored it completely. Massive civil rights violations that subverted an election just didn’t resonate with the mainstream press. On January 10, 2001, lawyers acting for the NAACP sued and won their case against ChoicePoint’s DBT, Secretary of State Katherine Harris (who coincidentally was enthusiastically co-chairing the Bush campaign), and Bush loyalist Clay Roberts, Director of the Division of Elections. In July 2002, to atone for its staggering error rate of 95%, DBT agreed to remove innocent voters from the now infamous list of purported ex-felons. (In 2002, the purge list hadn’t been corrected. In 2004, another suspicious list appeared. (end quote from hermes-press.com)

 

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 2000 Election Investigation Recommended that the U.S. Department of Justice should “immediately initiate the litigation process against the governor” (Jeb Bush)

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights conducted an extensive public investigation of allegations of voting irregularities during the 2000 presidential election in Florida.

“There emerges a confluence of circumstances that indicates intimidation and harassment of the Florida voters, and that was set in motion long before the November election,” said Commissioner Victoria Wilson of the US Commission on Civil Rights in their report, “Voting Irregularities in Florida During the 2000 Presidential Election.” Issued June 8, 2001, the report accuses Florida election officials of “gross dereliction” and “injustice.”

To follow is some of the text from the report at http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/ch9.htm

“Voting Irregularities in Florida During the 2000 Presidential Election”

“The investigation, utilizing the Commission’s subpoena power, included three days of hearings, more than 30 hours of testimony, 100 witnesses, and a systematic review of more than 118,000 pages of pertinent documents.

Responsibility Without Accountability

Florida’s governor is the state’s chief executive officer who “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Florida’s secretary of state is the chief election officer and oversees the Division of Elections. Each county has an elected supervisor of elections, except one. Together, the secretary of state and the county supervisors of elections preside over Florida’s elections.

Governor John Ellis Bush

When asked about his responsibilities to ensure the election laws of Florida were faithfully executed during the November 2000 election, Governor Bush testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that he had no real legal authority over election matters except for certifying the election and serving as a member of the state canvassing board. He indicated that he recused himself from participating on the state canvassing board because his brother was one of the presidential candidates. Governor Bush testified that “governors have the moral authority . . . to make sure that the laws, not only the state laws, but . . . also federal laws are upheld. . . .” When asked what authority and responsibility he had regarding preparation for the 2000 presidential election, Governor Bush testified that he had none and that “the secretary of state and the 67 supervisors of elections were responsible for that, and they carried out their duties.”

Under the Florida Constitution, the governor is charged with ensuring that “the laws be faithfully executed,” a responsibility Governor Bush apparently delegated to others with respect to elections. Under Florida election law, the governor is also specifically empowered to “appoint special officers to investigate alleged violations of the election laws . . .” Governor Bush testified that he had not appointed any officers to do any investigation of alleged irregularities surrounding the November 2000 election but would “if there was a reason to do so.” As of the date of this report there is no indication that the governor has exercised this authority by appointing special officers to investigate the widespread allegations of violations of the Florida election law”.

Findings:

Despite the closeness of the election, it was widespread voter disenfranchisement, not the dead-heat contest, that was the extraordinary feature in the Florida election.

Disenfranchisement of Florida voters fell most harshly on the shoulders of African Americans. Statewide, based on county-level statistical estimates, African American voters were nearly 10 times more likely than white voters to have their ballots rejected in the November 2000 election.

 

MISSING EMAILS

According to an article posted at American Bridge

“Bush used a personal email address as governor, and there are messages missing. As the Washington Post reporters, “Bush used his personal email address, jeb@jeb.org, to conduct official, political, and personal business…” but Bush’s email disclosure website (which was already public and available at the Florida state archives) lacks many key messages, including any messages between Jeb Bush and his brother, then-President George W. Bush.

Media accounts establish that Bush, not the State of Florida, decided which private emails to disclose – apparently nothing would have stopped the Bush team from selectively leaving out politically problematic emails. As the Tampa Bay Times reported, “The Bush files, though enormous, are not complete” because they lacked “emails the governor deemed not relevant to the public record.” In other words, Bush selected what was “relevant” or not for the public record, not civil servants.

The numbers do not add up. In 2007 Bush claimed he received 2.5 million emails on his public accounts, and 550,000 emails on his private accounts (Source, Naples Daily News, 7/12/07). Bush’s “disclosure” only contains a total of 250,000 emails. (Source, New York Times, 2/9/15)

There are media reports that Bush only recently “completed” handing over emails, despite leaving office eight years ago, potentially violating the law. A Bloomberg politics reporter Michael Bender tweeted today that “FL law requires govs to turn over emails after leaving office. Jeb didn’t finish turning over emails until last year.” He further tweeted that “Bush may not have complied with FL law until considering a presidential campaign. 119.021(4)(a).” That statute requires that “Whoever has custody of any public records shall deliver [them], at the expiration of his or her term of office…”.

News reports indicate that Jeb Bush used a private, personally owned email server. Full article at https://americanbridgepac.org/jeb-bush-hypocrisy-on-email-disclosure/

 

According to an article posted at MotherJones.com

Bush’s email archive, which includes more than 250,000 messages, has produced no piercing insights or major news stories about his gubernatorial stint. There are an immense number of emails from constituents weighing in on the issues of the day. But when it comes to the major issues of his governorship, there are—curiously—very few, if any, emails between Bush and his aides.

This email archive is not easy to search. It is comprised of 248 separate files and is hardly user-friendly. This search yielded little correspondence revealing Bush’s actions and decisions regarding pivotal events. It turns out that what’s most notable about Bush’s email trove is what’s not in it“. END QUOTE from Mother Jones. Click here to view the full article.

 

Florida Governor’s Office in Tallahassee Made 95 Telephone calls to the George W. Bush Presidential Campaign

When it became clear that the disputed Florida election could deliver the White House to his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush publicly stated that he recused himself from any official role in the recount, to avoid the “slightest appearance of a conflict of interest.”

Despite his stated hands-off policy, six of his staffers took unpaid leaves to volunteer on the recount.

Bush’s communications director in July 2001, Katie Baur, said, “While he recused himself from any involvement in what happened after Nov. 7, he did not recuse himself from his role as a brother.” What’s not known is that the level of direct involvement was, frankly, enormous.

The Los Angeles Times reported on July 14, 2001, “The Florida governor’s office in Tallahassee made 95 telephone calls to the George W. Bush presidential campaign, its advisers, lawyers and staffers during the 36-day recount period, records show. At least 10 calls came from an office number used primarily by Jeb Bush, including one call to a private line in George W. Bush’s gubernatorial office in Austin.

Another call from Jeb Bush’s number went to Karl Rove, his brother’s campaign strategist. One went to the Texas governor’s chief of staff, Clay Johnson. Another went to Michigan Gov. John Engler, who soon flew to Florida to monitor the ballot recount in Broward County. Additional calls were logged to cell phones assigned to Bush campaign staffers.

In an e-mail to The Times, Jeb Bush said he could not recall the purpose of the calls. “I have no clue what these calls were about,” he wrote.

Supporters of former Democratic nominee Al Gore have questioned whether Jeb Bush used his position to influence events behind the scenes after the election. It now appears he was more involved than he has publicly acknowledged.

The governor visited the state GOP headquarters in Tallahassee that functioned as the Bush campaign command center for the recount at least once, for example. He also dialed into at least one conference call with campaign operatives, aides said.

Full article at http://articles.latimes.com/2001/jul/14/news/mn-22362

 

 

 

2nd Worst president in history, REPUBLICAN George W. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq which led to the illegal invasion and war against Iraq. That war was clearly illegal because Iraq did nothing to the United States and therefore George W. Bush had no legitimate reason to attack Iraq. The Iraq war caused the deaths of over 100,000 Iraqi citizens and over 4,000 Americans.

 

THE RIGGED ELECTION OF GEORGE W. BUSH CAUSED THE FOLLOWING EVENTS;

Per article at (http://dyn.politico.com/members/forums/thread.cfm?catid=1&subcatid=4&threadid=2895278&start=271&CurrentPage=10) and copies found elsewhere on the internet, here’s just a few of the crimes and misdeeds as a result of the installation of George W. Bush as President

• Installation of George W. Bush, a illegitimate president who was not elected by the American people
• Lying to the American People about Weapons of Mass Destruction to justify War Against Iraq
• Declaring and Engaging in a Illegal and unprovoked War against Iraq
• Deaths and Injuries: Causing the deaths of 4,475 Americans, 32,331 wounded Americans and the deaths of over 112,000 Iraqi Civilians
• Debt of 10 Trillion dollars due to tax cuts and unpaid for wars
• Appointment of Conservative Supreme Court Judges who destroyed the voting rights act of 1965
• The creation of ISIS due to the invasion of Iraq, be-headings and people being burned alive
• War Crimes: In the case of Hamdan vs Rumsfeld, it was proven that numerous war crimes have been committed by the Bush Administration in the war against Iraq, including the preemptive invasion itself. This does not include the unaccounted-for millions of dollars lost in Iraq or the unlawful management by the US State Department regarding the US Contractors operating in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan. Holding and torturing prisoners being held without due process at Guantanamo Bay and the Abu Ghraib prison scandal are also serious war crimes.
• Outing of a CIA Agent: The outing of Valerie Plame-Wilson by the Bush Administration, admitted by the CIA as being a covert agent, has led directly to Dick Cheney and possibly directly to the President.
• Spying on Americans: President Bush has admitted to his program of warrentless spying against millions of Americans in violation of the Forth Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
• Missing e-mails: Two federal statutes require presidential communications, including White House e-mails, to be preserved for the nation’s historical records. From 2001 to October 2003, the White House records system over-wrote all their e-mail files, and up to 2005, some e-mails still were not fully preserved. CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) and the National Security Archives allege that millions of e-mails are missing from White House servers. (It is interesting that the timing of these lost e-mails is when most of the major illegal Bush activities were occurring.)
• Misuse of e-mail systems: Both the Republican National Committee e-mail system and the White House system were used within the White House to perform partisan political activities. As the White House is public property, it is against the law to do partisan political business while on public White House property.
• Unlawful FBI Activities: The ACLU has released documents showing that the Bush Administration directed the FBI to expand the definition of “domestic terrorism” to include citizens engaged in nonviolent protest and civil disobedience. This is totally unconstitutional.
• Firing of US Attorneys: This was a successful attempt by the President to use his US Attorney General and the US Justice Department for partisan political gains. VIDEO
• Response to Hurricane Katrina: This was a demonstration of gross negligence by the Bush Administration. A major, obvious betrayal of public trust.
• Scooter Libby: Bush Obstructed and Shorted-Circuited Justice when he commuted the prison sentence of “Scooter” Libby. This was another example of TWO JUSTICE SYSTEMS… one for the “Rich and Well-Connected” and another for everyone else.
• Koch Industries was indicted by the DoJ in 2000 for knowingly dumping “at least 91 metric tons of uncontrolled benzene in its liquid waste streams” at its Corpus Christi refinery, and for conspiring to cover it up in an attempt to deceive regulators.After George W. Bush took office in 2001, however, “his Attorney General John Ashcroft dropped 88 counts against Koch for the benzene spill and cover-up” in exchange for a guilty plea to falsifying documents and a $20 million fine (a settlement from $350 million in potential fines.)The Kochs made out pretty well in exchange for their $32,200 contribution to the 2000 Bush campaign.  [Source: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8778]
• And much more…

None of these things would have happened were it not for the Jeb Bush Administration and Republicans actions which helped brother George W. Bush to be installed as president.

 

2004 ELECTION RIGGED

Harvey Wasserman and Robert J. Fitrakis, who wrote a book “What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft And Fraud in the 2004 Election”, explained that the combination of computer hacking, ballot destruction, and the discrepancy between exit polling (which showed a big Kerry win in Ohio) and the “real” vote tabulation, all point to one answer: the Republicans stole the 2004 election.

“A 6.7% shift in exit polls does not happen by chance. So we have irrefutable confirmation that what we were saying was true and that every piece of the puzzle in the Ohio 2004 election was flawed,” Wasserman said.

 

The Above video shows how Ohio Election Computers were hacked and how the man who oversaw the operation died mysteriously in a plane crash soon after giving a deposition.

 

https://www.toledoblade.com/local/politics/2007/01/24/2-election-workers-in-Cleveland-convicted-of-rigging-04-presidential-recount/stories/200701240022

UPDATE: Jan 24, 2007 – CLEVELAND: Per the above article;  “Two election workers in the state s most populous county were convicted today of illegally rigging the 2004 presidential election recount.

The prosecution accused the employees of secretly reviewing pre-selected ballots before the recount in order to avoid a more costly, time-consuming hand count of all votes.

Jacqueline Maiden, the elections coordinator who was the board s third-highest ranking employee when she was indicted last March, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer each were convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct of an elections employee. The felony conviction carries a possible sentence of six to 18 months.

Maiden and Dreamer also were convicted of one misdemeanor count each of failure of elections employees to perform their duty.

The employees were accused of working behind closed doors three days before the public Dec. 16, 2004, recount to pick ballots they knew would not cause discrepancies when checked by hand.

Ohio gave Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry in the close election and hold on to the White House in 2004″.

 

 

2016 ELECTION RIGGED

2016 Election Rigged for Trump

 

Russian Report Confirms Attack On 2016 US Election

Rachel Maddow discusses details of a Russian media report that explains that the reason Russian intelligence cyber experts were arrested for treason as the sources that helped the U.S. figure out who was responsible for the DNC hack.

 

Russian influence becomes a feature of American elections when Trump is on the ballot

Rachel Maddow reviews how Vladimir Putin asserted his interest in electing Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020 and appears to be doing even more to help Trump get elected in 2024. Victoria Nuland, former acting deputy secretary of state, joins to discuss.

 

Russia Seeks Parity With US On Cyber-Power

Rachel Maddow reports on the testimony before the House Intelligence Committee hearing on Donald Trump and Russian cyber attacks and points out Russia’s desire to be seen as equal to the US in the sphere of cyber-power.

 

 

 

Mapping Donald Trump’s Many Ties To Vladimir Putin’s Russia

 

The US intelligence community found that Russia tried to influence the outcome of the 2016 US election by boosting Donald Trump and harming Hillary Clinton, according to the declassified intelligence report released by the Director of National Intelligence.

Click the link below to read and download a copy of the report;

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3254237/Russia-Hack-Report.pdf

 

Trump was complicit in encouraging Russia to engage in Espionage when he said; Russia: “If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press”. It’s clear Russia was listening because within hours, Wikileaks released 8,000 DNC emails. The DNC was hacked by two groups that linked to senior levels of the Russian government.

 

Rachel Maddow reviews some of the highlights of a lengthy report from The Washington Post that Vladimir Putin was directing a cyberattack on the U.S. election.

 

Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to help Trump in 2016: Senate report

 

 

Senate Intelligence Committee releases final report on Russian interference in 2016

The report concluded that the 2016 Trump campaign had repeated contacts with Russian operatives, and said campaign chairman Paul Manafort “represented a grave counterintelligence threat.”

 

New evidence on Russian interference in 2016 election

A Senate Intelligence Committee report details how Russia targeted voting systems across the U.S. and warns the threat persists today.

 

13 Russians Indicted With Charges Of Interfering In 2016 U.S. Election

 

Vladimir Putin not only engaged in tactics to influence the US 2016 election, but has a history in meddling in other countries elections to help install Right Wingers into positions of powers, because Right Wingers anti-democratic authoritarian policies and ideologies align well with that of Fascist Dictator Putin.

 

 

Many themes of Trump dossier have borne out over time

Rachel Maddow reviews how recent revelations and admissions by Trump team members have shown many of the themes of the Trump dossier to have merit.

 

More Pieces Of Donald Trump Russia Dossier Check Out

Rachel Maddow notes that while the dossier of intelligence about Donald Trump ties to Russia remains unconfirmed, pieces of it have checked out upon investigation by the press, though the primary government investigators are former Trump campaign officials.

 

In 27 states, a program called the Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck suppressed and purged enough minority voters to swing the election for Donald Trump.

The rigging was a simple process: in 27 Republican-controlled states (including critical swing states) hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of people showed up to vote, but were mysteriously blocked from voting for allegedly being registered with the intent to vote in multiple states.

 

The above video recorded on November 26, 2017 with MSNBC Host Joy Reid interviewing Greg Palast is the only interview done about this on any Television Network.

 

Millions of Black, Hispanic & Asians Voters Have Been Purged

Greg Palast, Al Jazeera, BBC News, The Guardian/Billionaires & Ballot Bandits joins Thom Hartmann. Jim Crow-style voter suppression has returned to America. That’s the conclusion of a shocking new report from investigative journalist Greg Palast for Al Jazeera America that takes a deep dive into a controversial program known as Interstate Crosscheck. According to his investigation “election officials in 27 states, most of them Republicans, have launched a program that threatens a massive purge of voters from the rolls. Millions, especially black, Hispanic and Asian-American voters, are at risk.”

 

Per the above article: The massive election-rigging scandal the media ignored. In 27 states, a program called the Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck suppressed and purged minority votes

The election of 2016 may well have been stolen — or to use Donald Trump’s oft-repeated phrase — “rigged,” and nobody in the media seems willing to discuss it.

The rigging was a pretty simple process, in fact: in 27 Republican-controlled states (including critical swing states) hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of people showed up to vote, but were mysteriously blocked from voting for allegedly being registered with the intent to vote in multiple states.

Greg Palast, an award-winning investigative journalist, writes a stinging piece in Rolling Stone magazine (August 2016 edition), predicting that the presidential election had already been decided: “The GOP’s Stealth War Against Voters.” He also wrote and produced a brilliant documentary on this exact subject that was released well before the election, titled The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.

He said a program called the Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck had been quietly put together in Kansas and was being used by Republican secretaries of state in 27 states to suppress and purge African American, Asian and Hispanic votes in what would almost certainly be the swing states of the 2016 election.

Crosscheck was started by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach back in 2007 under the guise of combating so-called voter fraud. In the ultimate thumb in the eye to the American voter, the state where Crosscheck started was the only state to refuse to participate in a New York Times review of voter fraud in the 2016 election, which found that, basically, there wasn’t any fraud at the level of individual voters. Turns out, according to Palast, that a total of 7 million voters—including up to 344,000 in Pennsylvania, 589,000 in North Carolina and up to 449,000 in Michigan (based on available Crosscheck data from 2014)—may have been denied the right to have their votes counted under this little known but enormously potent Crosscheck program.

 

Here are examples of Crosscheck in action:
Trump victory margin in Michigan: 13,107
Michigan Crosscheck purge list: 449,922

Trump victory margin in Arizona: 85,257
Arizona Crosscheck purge list: 270,824

Trump victory margin in North Carolina: 177,008
North Carolina Crosscheck purge list: 589,393

“University of Wisconsin-Madison political scientist Kenneth Mayer found that between 12,000 and 23,000 registered voters in Madison and Milwaukee—and as many as 45,000 statewide—were deterred from voting by the ID law. “We have hard evidence there were tens of thousands of people who were unable to vote because of the voter ID law”. Link to full article below.

That’s way more than enough votes to swing the 2016 election to Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

There’s more…

Exit polls in key states, FLORIDA , NORTH CAROLINA and WISCONSIN showed Hillary Clinton the winner.

Using exit poll totals compiled by election researcher Theodore de Macedo Soares, seen in the table below on this page as well as available at this link, compared to an ongoing tally of raw votes totals posted at this link by Dave Wasserman of Cook Political Report, here is the discrepancy that has caused the suspicions of what Trump himself would call a “rigged election.”

Note that actual vote totals are compiled as of November 16.

FLORIDA — 29 Electoral Votes

(numbers equal percentage points)

Exit Polls: Clinton 47.7, Trump 46.4 — Clinton wins by 1.3

Actual: Clinton 47.8, Trump 49.0 — Trump wins by 1.2

Trump gain between exit polls and actual results: 2.5

NORTH CAROLINA — 15 Electoral Votes

Exit Polls: Clinton 48.6, Trump 46.5 — Clinton wins by 2.1

Actual: Clinton 46.1, Trump 49.9 — Trump wins by 3.8

Trump gain: 5.9

WISCONSIN — 10 Electoral Votes

Exit Polls: Clinton 48.2, Trump 44.3 — Clinton wins by 3.9

Actual: Clinton 47.6, Trump 48.8 — Trump wins by 1.2

Trump gain: 5.1

Full story at: heavy.com/news/2016/11/2016-exit-polls-did-hillaty-clinton-win-presidential-election-voter-fraud-donald-trump-lose-rigged/

 

OTHER SOURCES CLAIM THE 2016 ELECTION WAS RIGGED

The League of Women Voters claim “The 2016 Presidential Election Was Rigged” in their article at lwv.org/press-releases/2016-presidential-election-was-rigged by Voter Suppression.

Chris Carson, president of the League of Women Voters stated “In Wisconsin, President-elect Trump beat Secretary Clinton by roughly 27,000 votes, however according to federal court, 300,000 registered voters lacked the proper photo ID.

Details regarding 300,000 registered voters lacked photo ID at thenation.com/article/the-gops-attack-on-voting-rights-was-the-most-under-covered-story-of-2016/

“We are not talking about vigilante voter intimidation,” said Carson. “We are talking about official, legal voter suppression by state legislatures and election officials.”

Like the 2000 & 2004 Elections, this matter is not being reported by the mainstream media.

 

Note how this machine is rigged for Romney in 2012.

 

FLORIDA REPUBLICANS USE DIRTY TRICKS TO ‘WIN’ ELECTIONS

CNN reports how Republicans used “dirty tricks” to Rig Three (3) 2020 Florida State Senate Elections with Dark Money and 3rd Party Phantom Candidates.

(Per the article below from CNN) “A month before Election Day in Florida a mysterious company called Proclivity, Inc. contributed $550,000 to a pair of newly formed political action committees in the state. Two days later, the money flowed from the PACs to an Orlando-area print and advertising firm.

Shortly thereafter, came a torrent of nearly identical political fliers seemingly intended to siphon away support from Democratic candidates by tricking voters into casting their ballots for purported spoiler candidates who demonstrated no real interest in getting elected. None, for example, engaged in typical campaigning activities or raised significant funds.
In one case, the mailers appear to have helped a Republican—a co-founder of Latinas For Trump—unseat the Democratic incumbent in a state Senate race by a razor-thin margin of just 32 votes”.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/23/politics/florida-dark-money-mystery-invs/index.html

 

 

 

91-Year-Old Decorated WWII Veteran Targeted By Florida Governor Rick Scott’s Voter Purge

Florida Republicans took voter suppression to brazen extremes. After the 2010 election, Republican Gov. Rick Scott instructed Secretary of State Ken Browning to compile a massive database of alleged “non-citizen” voters. This resulted in a 91-year-old World War II veteran who won a Bronze star being told by the state of Florida to prove he is a citizen or be removed from voter roll.

 

Former FL GOP chair says ‘right-wing crazies’ want to suppress black vote

Former Florida Republican Party Chair Jim Greer testified in a lawsuit filed against his former party that “whack-a-do, right-wing crazies” wanted to suppress the black vote through Voter ID and tactics like current state Gov. Rick Scott’s efforts to purge voter rolls.

Jim Greer, stated “I sat in on many meetings where it was discussed how to make sure what happened in 2008, when Obama brought out the college-aged voters, the minority voters, never happened again”.

 

The 2022 Florida Gubernatorial election results were very suspicious. Democrats vote count in 2018 was 4,043,723 and in 2022 it was 3,105,469, a drop of almost 1 million votes. Hard to believe that many Democrats didn’t show up to vote.

 

It defies logic that a majority of Floridians voted to re-elected Ron DeSantis in 2022 after passing and attempting to pass some of the most harsh, restrictive laws in the United States, as shown in the list above.

It also deifies logic that Florida Amendment 4, Right to Abortion Initiative and Recreational Marijuana Amendment 3 didn’t pass in 2024, when similar Initiatives have passed in other Red States. It’s well known that Florida Republicans didn’t want either of these to pass. Seems that what-ever Florida Republicans want, Florida Republicans get… lending credence that they’re rigging elections to maintain power no matter how the people vote, so they can cram their radical Right Wing Policies down Floridians throats

 

A poll from The Political Matrix/Listener Group showed Charlie Crist leading Florida Ron DeSantis in the gubernatorial race as of Sep 26, 2022.

 

As pointed out by the Tampa Bay Times, “Florida’s voter turnout for Democrats was an outlier compared to the rest of the country. Statewide, nearly two-thirds of registered Republicans showed up to the polls, compared to just half of registered Democrats” according to a Tampa Bay Times analysis.

 

The huge difference in Democrats’ vote count between 2018 of 4,043,723 and 2022 of 3,105,469 (a drop of almost a million votes) is remarkable.

There’s a total 4,970,554 registered Democrats in Florida and yet Charlie Crist only received 3,105,469 votes in 2022. When you subtract 3,105,469 who voted for Crist, minus the total 4,970,554 registered Democrats in Florida, the total comes to 1,865,085 who supposedly didn’t vote for Democrat Charlie Crist. On top of that is the 4,008,962 no Party Affiliation voters. It’s reasonable to assume some of them would have voted for Crist.

 

Per Florida voter stats, the total registered Florida Voters is 14,539,989. The total votes for all Florida Gubernatorial candidates (DeSantis, Crist, Gimenez and Roos) was 7,770,109. 14,539,989 registered voters – 7,770,109 who voted = 6,769,880 who didn’t vote. It’s hard to believe that many registered voters didn’t vote.

Democrats turning out across the United States in high numbers is why the “Red Wave” didn’t happen in 2022

 

https://www.nbcmiami.com/decision-2022/turnout-was-a-big-problem-for-democrats-in-major-florida-counties/2906393/

Per an article at nbcmiami.com, “Turnout Was a Big Problem for Democrats in Major Florida Counties”

“In Miami-Dade County, there are 135,229 more registered Democrats than Republicans, but more Republicans showed up: 61% of registered Republicans voted and only 46% of Democrat registered voters”.

“There are 106,299 more registered Democrats than Republicans in Palm Beach County. 55% of registered Democrats showed up and 66% of Republicans showed up”.

“There are 53,156 more registered Democrats than Republicans in Hillsborough County but only 39% of Democrats showed up and 44% of Republicans showed up to vote”.

As reported by the Miami Herald; “The state Republican Party of Florida changed the voter registration of hundreds of low-income voters to Republican without their consent“.  This proves Florida Republicans engaged in unethical activities to affect the 2022 election outcome.

 

DISENFRANCHISEMENT OF VOTERS

Republicans continue to pass laws which make it difficult for Minorities, Young People, the Elderly and Women to Vote. A Judge who has been voting for 49 years couldn’t vote in her own courthouse where everyone knew her because of repressive Republican Voter ID Laws in Texas.

 

ELECTIONS RIGGED BY THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

The Electoral College Is A Plague On America

The Electoral College allowed two unpopular Republican candidates who received the least votes in 2 elections since 2000 to become President; George W. Bush who lost by almost 600,000 votes in the 2000 election and Donald Trump who lost by 2.84 million in 2016.

 

If we had a REAL democracy, the person who gets the most votes would be the winner. In every other country which has a democracy on this planet, the person who receives the most votes is the winner. The fact that we don’t elect our president by the most votes proves there is NO REAL DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED STATES.

And the fault is 100% REPUBLICANS… because they REFUSE to eliminate the Electoral College because it put George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016 in the White House against the will of the majority.

 

2000 and 2016  Elections Stolen By The Electoral Collage

The Electoral College has allowed two unpopular Republican candidates who received less popular votes in 2 elections since 2000 to become President; George W. Bush who lost by almost 600,000 votes in the 2000 election and Donald Trump who lost by 2.9 million votes. Neither of these incompetent Republicans should have been president. More people voted against them than for them.

 

Minority Rule Is Killing The United States

Lawrence O’Donnell looks at how the Electoral College is forcing Americans to live under a nation where a Supreme Court majority, mostly picked by presidents who lost the popular vote, is poised to take away a Constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

 

A video trip down memory lane shows how Trump Republicans of 2020 are as lawless as Nixon Republicans from 1972